What are Reading Boxes?

Reading Boxes provide informative, imaginative and motivational text whilst asking literal, interpretive, inferential and critical questions. The Reading Boxes are self managing, motivational and allow for totally individualised learning and are great for all readers, including reluctant readers.

Students' reading capabilities are taken out of their comfort zone with both empowering and challenging reading options with text types ranging from fictional narratives to reports.

McGraw Hill Reading Boxes

Text Types

The text types available in Reading Boxes are:

  • Fictional narratives
  • Factual recounts
  • Fictional recounts
  • Reports
  • Descriptions

 

 

  • Persuasion/expositions
  • Instructions/procedures
  • Explanations
  • Poetry
  • Discussions
  • Comics
  • Visual

How Do Reading Boxes Aid Development?

Reading Boxes can be utilised to facilitate the development of key reading skills like comprehension, grammar, phonics, writing and vocabulary through both independent and guided learning pathways.

How can Reading Boxes do this?


Empowering Independence

Encourage strong readers to work independently to manage their own reading and comprehension development, allowing teachers to concentrate on those who are struggling.


Supporting All Readers

Includes multi-levelled reading content that services the needs of students at all reading stages, whether they are a new or seasoned reader, or a strong or weak reader.


Drives Understanding

Develops text understanding by asking those all important literal, interpretive, inferential and critical questions, helping to shape young minds' in preparation for academic growth, including SAT prep.

Research Base

Independent Education Research and Evaluation Databases

Randomized Controlled Studies

 

  • Use of Evidence-Based, Small-Group Reading Instruction for English Language Learners in Elementary Grades: Secondary-Tier Intervention
    This report shows an experimental/comparison study of secondarylevel, small-group instruction included 318 first- and second-grade students (170 ELL and 148 English-only) from six elementary schools. All schools served high numbers of ELL students with varying school SES in urhan and suburban communities. Experimental schools implemented a three-tier model of intervention. Results indicated generally higher gains for ELL students enrolled in direct instruction interventions. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Other Scientific Research

Request More Information